↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Growth Trajectories in Classifying Fetal Growth Restriction

Overview of attention for article published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Growth Trajectories in Classifying Fetal Growth Restriction
Published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2013
DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e31829ca9a7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward D. Barker, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Fiona Alderdice, Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael P. Geary, Mairead M. Kennelly, Keelin O'Donoghue, Alyson Hunter, John J. Morrison, Gerard Burke, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth C. Tully, Fergal D. Malone

Abstract

To examine the validity of a growth trajectory method to discriminate between pathologically and constitutionally undergrown fetuses using repeated measures of estimated fetal weight.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 9 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#3,150,615
of 4,505,482 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#2,356
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,580
of 89,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#108
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.