↓ Skip to main content

Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005545.pub3
Authors

Franz Majoko, Glenn Gardener

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 30%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Psychology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#4,428,170
of 14,515,808 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,406
of 10,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,959
of 350,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,515,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.