↓ Skip to main content

Local Variation In Public Health Preparedness: Lessons From California

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Local Variation In Public Health Preparedness: Lessons From California
Published in
Health Affairs, January 2004
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Lurie, Jeffrey Wasserman, Michael Stoto, Sarah Myers, Poki Namkung, Jonathan Fielding, Robert Burciaga Valdez

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 36%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Social Sciences 7 32%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#1,686,712
of 7,142,178 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#2,631
of 3,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,027
of 96,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#51
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,142,178 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.