You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antibiotic prophylaxis for short-term catheter bladder drainage in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005428.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gail Lusardi, Allyson Lipp, Christine Shaw |
Abstract |
Urinary tract infections account for about 40% of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infections, and about 80% of urinary tract infections acquired in hospital are associated with urinary catheters. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 22% |
Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 51 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,350,623
of 23,706,059 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,088
of 12,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,768
of 196,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.