↓ Skip to main content

What factors are associated with a better restoration of pelvic version after adult spinal deformity surgery?

Overview of attention for article published in Spine Deformity, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
Title
What factors are associated with a better restoration of pelvic version after adult spinal deformity surgery?
Published in
Spine Deformity, April 2024
DOI 10.1007/s43390-024-00863-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Raganato, Alejandro Gómez-Rice, Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro, Fernando Escámez, Gloria Talavera, Antonio Aguilar, José Miguel Sánchez-Márquez, Nicomedes Fernández-Baíllo, Francisco Javier Sánchez Perez-Grueso, Frank Kleinstück, Ahmet Alanay, Ibrahim Obeid, Ferran Pellisé, Javier Pizones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,982,449
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Spine Deformity
#140
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,148
of 187,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Deformity
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them