The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Low Back Pain is Managed-A Mixed-Methods Study in 32 Countries. Part 2 of Low Back Pain in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Series.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2519/jospt.2024.12406 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saurab Sharma, Anupa Pathak, Romy Parker, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Babita Ghai, Chinonso Igwesi-Chidobe, Prawit Janwantanakul, Fabianna Resende de Jesus-Moraleida, Mulugeta Bayisa Chala, Mohammadreza Pourahmadi, Andrew M Briggs, Edward Gorgon, Clare L Ardern, Karim M Khan, James H McAuley, Alia Alghwiri, Oluwayomi Abolade Aoko, Habibu Salisu Badamasi, Jose A Calvache, Mary Suma Cardosa, Shankar Ganesh, Moges Gashaw, Johanna Ghiringhelli, Santiago Gigena, ATM Tanveer Hasan, Syed Atiqul Haq, Emmanuel Ng’wiza Jacob, Dina Christa Janse van Rensburg, Oyéné Kossi, Chang Liu, Rinkle Malani, Brett James Nairn Mason, Charbel Najem, Tania Ines Nava-Bringas, Ildephonse Nduwimana, Romain Perera, Wajida Perveen, Andrés Pierobon, Emília Pinto, Rafael Z Pinto, Firmansyah Purwanto, Mohammad Dawood Rahimi, Felipe JJ Reis, Md Abu Bakar Siddiq, Dipak Shrestha, Monu Tamang, Lenny Vasanthan T, Carel Viljoen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 79% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 33% |
| Psychology | 1 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,207,512
of 26,740,027 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#781
of 2,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,858
of 293,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,740,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.