↓ Skip to main content

Visualizing External Validity: Graphical Displays to Inform the Extension of Treatment Effects from Trials to Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Visualizing External Validity: Graphical Displays to Inform the Extension of Treatment Effects from Trials to Clinical Practice
Published in
Epidemiology, January 2023
DOI 10.1097/ede.0000000000001694
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Lund, Michael A. Webster-Clark, Daniel Westreich, Hanna K. Sanoff, Nicholas Robert, Jennifer R. Frytak, Marley Boyd, Shahar Shmuel, Til Stürmer, Alexander P. Keil

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,937,993
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology
#3,232
of 3,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353,130
of 476,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.