↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009101.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Susan O'Meara, Sohan Deshpande, Katharine Speak

Abstract

Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from including hydrogel dressings. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Other 17 8%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Chemistry 9 4%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 36 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,454,898
of 15,635,132 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,835
of 11,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,073
of 158,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,635,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.