Melina Peressini, Rosario Garcia-Campelo, Bartomeu Massuti, Cristina Martí, Manuel Cobo, Vanesa Gutiérrez, Manuel Dómine, José Fuentes, Margarita Majem, Javier de Castro, Juan F Córdoba, María P Diz, Dolores Isla, Emilio Esteban, Enric Carcereny, Laia Vila, Alberto Moreno-Vega, Silverio Ros, Amaia Moreno, Francisco J García, Gerardo Huidobro, Carlos Aguado, Victor Cebey-López, Javier Valdivia, Ramón Palmero, Pilar Lianes, Marta López-Brea, Oscar J Vidal, Mariano Provencio, Edurne Arriola, Javier Baena, Mercedes Herrera, Helena Bote, Magdalena Molero, Vera Adradas, Santiago Ponce-Aix, Angel Nuñez-Buiza, Álvaro Ucero, Susana Hernandez, Fernando Lopez-Rios, Esther Conde, Luis Paz-Ares, Jon Zugazagoitia
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,791,776
of 26,493,631 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,296
of 13,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,028
of 345,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#14
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,493,631 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
