↓ Skip to main content

Development and Validation of an 18-Gene Urine Test for High-Grade Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Oncology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
82 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
68 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and Validation of an 18-Gene Urine Test for High-Grade Prostate Cancer
Published in
JAMA Oncology, June 2024
DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0455
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey J. Tosoian, Yuping Zhang, Lanbo Xiao, Cassie Xie, Nathan L. Samora, Yashar S. Niknafs, Zoey Chopra, Javed Siddiqui, Heng Zheng, Grace Herron, Neil Vaishampayan, Hunter S. Robinson, Kumaran Arivoli, Bruce J. Trock, Ashley E. Ross, Todd M. Morgan, Ganesh S. Palapattu, Simpa S. Salami, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Scott A. Tomlins, Lori J. Sokoll, Daniel W. Chan, Sudhir Srivastava, Ziding Feng, Martin G. Sanda, Yingye Zheng, John T. Wei, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Ian M. Thompson, Mohamed Bidair, Adam Kibel, Daniel W. Lin, Yair Lotan, Alan Partin, Samir Taneja, David H. Howard, Meredith M. Regan, Jack Groskopf, Jonathan Chipman, Dattatraya H. Patil, Douglas S. Scherr, Jacob Kagan, Jing Fan, Aron Y. Joon, Leonidas E. Bantis, Mark A. Rubin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 21%
Other 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 679. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#33,335
of 26,561,175 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#52
of 3,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#502
of 314,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#2
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.