↓ Skip to main content

REVIEW: Refuges for fauna in fire-prone landscapes: their ecological function and importance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REVIEW: Refuges for fauna in fire-prone landscapes: their ecological function and importance
Published in
Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12153
Authors

Natasha M. Robinson, Steve W.J. Leonard, Euan G. Ritchie, Michelle Bassett, Evelyn K. Chia, Sebastian Buckingham, Heloise Gibb, Andrew F. Bennett, Michael F. Clarke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 99 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Unspecified 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 51%
Environmental Science 32 28%
Unspecified 18 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2013.
All research outputs
#1,395,963
of 12,351,354 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#971
of 2,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,532
of 148,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#26
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,351,354 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.