You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Merging paleobiology with conservation biology to guide the future of terrestrial ecosystems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.aah4787 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony D Barnosky, Elizabeth A Hadly, Patrick Gonzalez, Jason Head, P David Polly, A Michelle Lawing, Jussi T Eronen, David D Ackerly, Ken Alex, Eric Biber, Jessica Blois, Justin Brashares, Gerardo Ceballos, Edward Davis, Gregory P Dietl, Rodolfo Dirzo, Holly Doremus, Mikael Fortelius, Harry W Greene, Jessica Hellmann, Thomas Hickler, Stephen T Jackson, Melissa Kemp, Paul L Koch, Claire Kremen, Emily L Lindsey, Cindy Looy, Charles R Marshall, Chase Mendenhall, Andreas Mulch, Alexis M Mychajliw, Carsten Nowak, Uma Ramakrishnan, Jan Schnitzler, Kashish Das Shrestha, Katherine Solari, Lynn Stegner, M Allison Stegner, Nils Chr Stenseth, Marvalee H Wake, Zhibin Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 265 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 68 | 26% |
United Kingdom | 15 | 6% |
Canada | 11 | 4% |
Spain | 10 | 4% |
Finland | 8 | 3% |
France | 5 | 2% |
Mexico | 4 | 2% |
Germany | 4 | 2% |
Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
Other | 32 | 12% |
Unknown | 105 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 176 | 66% |
Scientists | 83 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 690 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
Finland | 3 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 674 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 131 | 19% |
Researcher | 120 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 74 | 11% |
Student > Master | 70 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 5% |
Other | 127 | 18% |
Unknown | 131 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 210 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 153 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 76 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
Other | 51 | 7% |
Unknown | 166 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#117,635
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,767
of 83,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,775
of 426,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#60
of 1,132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.