You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous support for women during childbirth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003766.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hodnett, Ellen D, Gates, Simon, Hofmeyr, G Justus, Sakala, Carol, Ellen D Hodnett, Simon Gates, G Justus Hofmeyr, Carol Sakala |
| Abstract |
Historically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour. However, in hospitals worldwide, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the routine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 26% |
| Canada | 11 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1244 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 239 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 191 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 10% |
| Researcher | 90 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 71 | 6% |
| Other | 261 | 21% |
| Unknown | 286 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 322 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 302 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 105 | 8% |
| Psychology | 64 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 3% |
| Other | 109 | 9% |
| Unknown | 323 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 544. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#44,360
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 13,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228
of 201,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.