↓ Skip to main content

A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock
Published in
Critical Care, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc5962
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauralyn A McIntyre, Paul C Hébert, Dean Fergusson, Deborah J Cook, Ashique Aziz, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that early, aggressive resuscitation in patients with septic shock reduces mortality. The objective of this survey was to characterize reported resuscitation practices of Canadian physicians caring for adult critically ill patients with early septic shock.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 17%
Student > Postgraduate 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,760,834
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,794
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,367
of 78,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.