↓ Skip to main content

Peer support telephone calls for improving health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peer support telephone calls for improving health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006903.pub2
Authors

Jeremy Dale, Isabela O Caramlau, Antje Lindenmeyer, Susan M Williams

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 236 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 20%
Researcher 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Other 20 8%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Social Sciences 32 13%
Psychology 31 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 35 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,453,651
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,359
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,421
of 330,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.