↓ Skip to main content

Free Fatty Acid Receptors

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 50: FFA2 and FFA3 in Metabolic Regulation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
FFA2 and FFA3 in Metabolic Regulation
Chapter number 50
Book title
Free Fatty Acid Receptors
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/164_2016_50
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-950692-0, 978-3-31-950693-7
Authors

Cong Tang, Stefan Offermanns, Tang, Cong, Offermanns, Stefan

Editors

Graeme Milligan, Ikuo Kimura

Abstract

The short-chain fatty acid receptors FFA2 (GPR43) and FFA3 (GPR41) are activated by acetate, propionate, and butyrate. These ligands are produced by bacteria in the gut. In addition, the body itself can in particular produce acetate, and acetate plasma levels have been shown to be increased, e.g., in diabetic patients or during periods of starvation. FFA2 and FFA3 are both expressed by enteroendocrine cells and pancreatic β-cells. In addition, FFA2 is found on immune cells and adipocytes, whereas FFA3 is expressed by some peripheral neurons. It has therefore been speculated that short-chain fatty acid receptors are involved in the regulation of various body functions under different nutritional and metabolic conditions. Here we summarize recent data on the role of FFA2 and FFA3 in the regulation of metabolic, immunological, and neuronal functions and discuss the potential pharmacological relevance of this receptor system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,747,517
of 25,487,317 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#144
of 687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,024
of 323,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,487,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.