↓ Skip to main content

Just the facts: Evaluation and management of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
Title
Just the facts: Evaluation and management of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Published in
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, May 2024
DOI 10.1007/s43678-024-00694-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Rosenberg, Chirag Bhat, Erin M. Kelly, Brit Long

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,581,018
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
#699
of 1,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,142
of 166,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.