↓ Skip to main content

Bee venom effects on ubiquitin proteasome system in hSOD1G85R-expressing NSC34 motor neuron cells

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bee venom effects on ubiquitin proteasome system in hSOD1G85R-expressing NSC34 motor neuron cells
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seon Hwy Kim, So Young Jung, Kang-Woo Lee, Sun Hwa Lee, MuDan Cai, Sun-Mi Choi, Eun Jin Yang

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease that results from a progressive loss of motor neurons. Familial ALS (fALS) is caused by missense mutations in Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) that frequently result in the accumulation of mutant-protein aggregates that are associated with impairments in the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). UPS impairment has been implicated in many neurological disorders. Bee venom (BV) extracted from honey bees has been used as a traditional medicine for treating inflammatory diseases and has been shown to attenuate the neuroinflammatory events that occur in a symptomatic ALS animal model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 33%
Student > Master 9 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Neuroscience 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,386,934
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,502
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,075
of 196,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#31
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.