You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modelling the Toxicity of Nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-47754-1 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-31-947752-7, 978-3-31-947754-1
|
| Editors |
Lang Tran, Miguel A. Bañares, Robert Rallo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 27% |
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 27% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 31% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,670,482
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#218
of 5,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,172
of 423,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#22
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.