↓ Skip to main content

Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004185.pub3
Authors

Laura R Magni, Marianna Purgato, Chiara Gastaldon, Davide Papola, Toshi A Furukawa, Andrea Cipriani, Corrado Barbui

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 244 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 45 18%
Unspecified 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Researcher 25 10%
Other 68 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 38%
Unspecified 43 17%
Psychology 30 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 8%
Other 46 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#786,339
of 13,536,733 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,498
of 10,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,487
of 155,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,536,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.