The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can carbonation depth be measured in a nondestructive way? High-frequency quantitative ultrasound imaging for cement paste
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cement & Concrete Research, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107519 |
Authors |
Seungo Baek, Hyeong-Ki Kim, Michael L. Oelze, Gun Kim |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Materials Science | 1 | 11% |
Design | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,791,577
of 25,967,806 outputs
Outputs from Cement & Concrete Research
#24
of 1,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,204
of 116,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cement & Concrete Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.