You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How QOF is shaping primary care review consultations: a longitudinal qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Cheryl Hunter, Susanne Langer, Alexandra Stenhoff, Jessica Drinkwater, Elspeth A Guthrie, Peter Salmon |
| Abstract |
Long-term conditions (LTCs) are increasingly important determinants of quality of life and healthcare costs in populations worldwide. The Chronic Care Model and the NHS and Social Care Long Term Conditions Model highlight the use of consultations where patients are invited to attend a consultation with a primary care clinician (practice nurse or GP) to complete a review of the management of the LTC. We report a qualitative study in which we focus on the ways in which QOF (Quality and Outcomes Framework) shapes routine review consultations, and highlight the tensions exposed between patient-centred consulting and QOF-informed LTC management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 54% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 58% |
| Scientists | 14 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#968,464
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#61
of 2,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,905
of 209,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.