↓ Skip to main content

O adoecer pelo trabalho na enfermagem: uma revisão integrativa

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
O adoecer pelo trabalho na enfermagem: uma revisão integrativa
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, May 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0080-62342012000200031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Perfeito Ribeiro, Julia Trevisan Martins, Maria Helena Palucci Marziale, Maria Lucia do Carmo Cruz Robazzi

Abstract

Man's endless search for methods of performing different activities leads to increased workloads, which eventually result in physical, psychological and emotional conditions. The objective of this study was to seek scientific evidence regarding the types of work-related conditions or illnesses in nursing, as well as the means of coping and preventing occupational diseases and accidents. An integrative review was performed on the electronic health databases using the following descriptors: occupational disease, occupational prevention, and nursing worker. Twenty-seven articles were found. It was realized that nurses have back pain and musculoskeletal injuries, suffer accidents with sharp-edged materials and endure stress and tension at work, in addition to exposure to environmental pollution and dermatitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 23%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Psychology 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#267
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,441
of 176,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.