You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Análise normativa sobre a voz da criança na legislação brasileira de proteção à infância
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.04.58018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renata de Moura Bubadué, Ivone Evangelista Cabral, Franco Carnevale, Felipe Dutra Asensi |
| Abstract |
to identify and analyse children's voices in healthcare decision making in the discourse of Brazil's child protection laws. Documentary normative analysis of Brazil's child protection legislation (1988-2012) based on the content analysis of nine texts, conducted in 2015. The legislation acknowledges and stresses the voice of children in the decision-making process in research and healthcare. Any recognition of the right to dignity, liberty, information, and protection depends on what the adult decision-maker (with parental authority) believes is the child's capacity for discernment and whether the situation will cause self-harm. the normative child protection discourse grants children a voice, although with restrictions and under the authority of the adult with parental authority. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 16% |
| Psychology | 3 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#144
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,061
of 424,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.