↓ Skip to main content

Uptake and Patient Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery in a Publicly Funded System and Following Financial Incentives

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 2,896)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Uptake and Patient Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery in a Publicly Funded System and Following Financial Incentives
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2013
DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3123-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marko Simunovic, Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Ning Liu, Margherita Cadeddu, David Urbach

Abstract

To assess patterns of uptake and outcomes of laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery in Ontario, and the potential influence of surgical fee incentives instituted on October 1, 2005.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Unspecified 3 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2013.
All research outputs
#201,773
of 12,419,165 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#26
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,711
of 150,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,419,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.