You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Above-ground biomass and structure of 260 African tropical forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2012.0295 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon L. Lewis, Bonaventure Sonké, Terry Sunderland, Serge K. Begne, Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez, Geertje M. F. van der Heijden, Oliver L. Phillips, Kofi Affum-Baffoe, Timothy R. Baker, Lindsay Banin, Jean-François Bastin, Hans Beeckman, Pascal Boeckx, Jan Bogaert, Charles De Cannière, Eric Chezeaux, Connie J. Clark, Murray Collins, Gloria Djagbletey, Marie Noël K. Djuikouo, Vincent Droissart, Jean-Louis Doucet, Cornielle E. N. Ewango, Sophie Fauset, Ted R. Feldpausch, Ernest G. Foli, Jean-François Gillet, Alan C. Hamilton, David J. Harris, Terese B. Hart, Thales de Haulleville, Annette Hladik, Koen Hufkens, Dries Huygens, Philippe Jeanmart, Kathryn J. Jeffery, Elizabeth Kearsley, Miguel E. Leal, Jon Lloyd, Jon C. Lovett, Jean-Remy Makana, Yadvinder Malhi, Andrew R. Marshall, Lucas Ojo, Kelvin S.-H. Peh, Georgia Pickavance, John R. Poulsen, Jan M. Reitsma, Douglas Sheil, Murielle Simo, Kathy Steppe, Hermann E. Taedoumg, Joey Talbot, James R. D. Taplin, David Taylor, Sean C. Thomas, Benjamin Toirambe, Hans Verbeeck, Jason Vleminckx, Lee J. T. White, Simon Willcock, Hannsjorg Woell, Lise Zemagho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 592 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 115 | 18% |
| Researcher | 115 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 103 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 103 | 17% |
| Unknown | 114 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 196 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 191 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 7% |
| Engineering | 11 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 5% |
| Unknown | 144 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#592,284
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#505
of 7,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,585
of 209,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.