The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The educational impact of technology-enhanced learning in regional anaesthesia: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mairead Savage, Andrew Spence, Lloyd Turbitt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 67% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 67% |
| Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,341,223
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#993
of 6,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,542
of 323,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#10
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.