You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Telephone support for women during pregnancy and the first six weeks postpartum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009338.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tina Lavender, Yana Richens, Stephen J Milan, Rebecca MD Smyth, Therese Dowswell |
| Abstract |
Telephone communication is increasingly being accepted as a useful form of support within health care. There is some evidence that telephone support may be of benefit in specific areas of maternity care such as to support breastfeeding and for women at risk of depression. There is a plethora of telephone-based interventions currently being used in maternity care. It is therefore timely to examine which interventions may be of benefit, which are ineffective, and which may be harmful. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 774 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 761 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 123 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 96 | 12% |
| Researcher | 89 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 158 | 20% |
| Unknown | 183 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 215 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 126 | 16% |
| Psychology | 90 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 65 | 8% |
| Unknown | 212 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,918,150
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,110
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,980
of 208,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.