↓ Skip to main content

Telephone support for women during pregnancy and the first six weeks postpartum

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
524 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telephone support for women during pregnancy and the first six weeks postpartum
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009338.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina Lavender, Yana Richens, Stephen J Milan, Rebecca MD Smyth, Therese Dowswell

Abstract

Telephone communication is increasingly being accepted as a useful form of support within health care. There is some evidence that telephone support may be of benefit in specific areas of maternity care such as to support breastfeeding and for women at risk of depression. There is a plethora of telephone-based interventions currently being used in maternity care. It is therefore timely to examine which interventions may be of benefit, which are ineffective, and which may be harmful.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 524 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 511 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 15%
Researcher 73 14%
Student > Bachelor 54 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 8%
Other 117 22%
Unknown 60 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 94 18%
Psychology 74 14%
Social Sciences 37 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 79 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#982,106
of 15,712,594 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,740
of 11,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,207
of 160,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,712,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.