↓ Skip to main content

Reannotation and extended community resources for the genome of the non-seed plant Physcomitrella patens provide insights into the evolution of plant gene structures and functions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
34 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reannotation and extended community resources for the genome of the non-seed plant Physcomitrella patens provide insights into the evolution of plant gene structures and functions
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas D Zimmer, Daniel Lang, Karol Buchta, Stephane Rombauts, Tomoaki Nishiyama, Mitsuyasu Hasebe, Yves Van de Peer, Stefan A Rensing, Ralf Reski

Abstract

The moss Physcomitrella patens as a model species provides an important reference for early-diverging lineages of plants and the release of the genome in 2008 opened the doors to genome-wide studies. The usability of a reference genome greatly depends on the quality of the annotation and the availability of centralized community resources. Therefore, in the light of accumulating evidence for missing genes, fragmentary gene structures, false annotations and a low rate of functional annotations on the original release, we decided to improve the moss genome annotation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Czechia 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 151 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Master 32 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Design 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 18 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#909,408
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#118
of 11,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,316
of 204,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#3
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.