↓ Skip to main content

Reannotation and extended community resources for the genome of the non-seed plant Physcomitrella patens provide insights into the evolution of plant gene structures and functions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
44 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reannotation and extended community resources for the genome of the non-seed plant Physcomitrella patens provide insights into the evolution of plant gene structures and functions
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas D Zimmer, Daniel Lang, Karol Buchta, Stephane Rombauts, Tomoaki Nishiyama, Mitsuyasu Hasebe, Yves Van de Peer, Stefan A Rensing, Ralf Reski

Abstract

The moss Physcomitrella patens as a model species provides an important reference for early-diverging lineages of plants and the release of the genome in 2008 opened the doors to genome-wide studies. The usability of a reference genome greatly depends on the quality of the annotation and the availability of centralized community resources. Therefore, in the light of accumulating evidence for missing genes, fragmentary gene structures, false annotations and a low rate of functional annotations on the original release, we decided to improve the moss genome annotation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Czechia 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 5 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 22%
Computer Science 2 1%
Design 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 9 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#377,337
of 14,055,277 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#60
of 8,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,726
of 156,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,055,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them