↓ Skip to main content

Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
510 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009453.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Clement, Francesca Lassman, Elizabeth Barley, Sara Evans-Lacko, Paul Williams, Sosei Yamaguchi, Mike Slade, Nicolas Rüsch, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract

Mental health-related stigma is widespread and has major adverse effects on the lives of people with mental health problems. Its two major components are discrimination (being treated unfairly) and prejudice (stigmatising attitudes). Anti-stigma initiatives often include mass media interventions, and such interventions can be expensive. It is important to know if mass media interventions are effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 491 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 21%
Researcher 83 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 16%
Unspecified 59 12%
Student > Bachelor 57 11%
Other 125 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 114 22%
Unspecified 87 17%
Social Sciences 77 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 10%
Other 58 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#386,919
of 13,536,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,111
of 10,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,118
of 155,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,536,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.