↓ Skip to main content

Steroids for traumatic optic neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steroids for traumatic optic neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006032.pub4
Authors

Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Philip G Griffiths

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 20 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,914,550
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,247
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,156
of 144,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.