The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Revealing Early Spatial Patterns of Cellular Responsivity in Fiber-Reinforced Microenvironments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Tissue Engineering: Part A, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1089/ten.tea.2024.0017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Saitheja A. Pucha, Maddie Hasson, Hanna Solomon, Gail E. McColgan, Jennifer L. Robinson, Sebastián L. Vega, Jay M. Patel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 44% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 56% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,060,804
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering: Part A
#259
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,413
of 320,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering: Part A
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.