The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Global, regional and national time trends in incidence of adverse effects of medical treatment, 1990-2019: an age-period-cohort analysis from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study.
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016971 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liangquan Lin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 30% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 95% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#565,695
of 26,770,167 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#190
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,372
of 326,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,770,167 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.