↓ Skip to main content

Capsular Contracture In Silicone Breast Implants: Insights From Rat Models

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capsular Contracture In Silicone Breast Implants: Insights From Rat Models
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, September 2016
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201620150874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vilberto J Vieira, Armando D'Acampora, Fernanda S Neves, Paulo R Mendes, Zulmar A DE Vasconcellos, Rodrigo D'Eça Neves, Claudia P Figueiredo

Abstract

Breast augmentation with silicone implants is one of the most common procedures performed by plastic surgeons around the world. Capsular contracture is a frequent complication in breast augmentation and reconstructive surgery, that requires invasive intervention. The inflammatory response to implanted mammary prostheses appears to be directly associated to capsular contracture. This review discusses the evidences from rat models studies, on the role of inflammation and fibrosis in capsular contraction and its relation to silicone breast implants surface.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 31%