↓ Skip to main content

Clofibrate in combination with phototherapy for unconjugated neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clofibrate in combination with phototherapy for unconjugated neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009017.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryam Gholitabar, Hugh McGuire, Janet Rennie, Donal Manning, Rosalind Lai

Abstract

There are many pathological conditions leading to an elevated unconjugated bilirubin level (hyperbilirubinaemia) in neonates. Currently the standard therapies for unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia include phototherapy and exchange transfusion. In addition to phototherapy, clofibrate has been studied as a treatment for hyperbilirubinaemia in several countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Other 6 10%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Psychology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,277,100
of 13,199,565 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,026
of 10,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,005
of 154,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,199,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.