↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery

Overview of attention for article published in this source, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003949.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dumville, Jo C, McFarlane, Emma, Edwards, Peggy, Lipp, Allyson, Holmes, Alexandra

Abstract

Surgical site infection rates in the month following clean surgery vary from 0.6% (knee prosthesis) to 5% (limb amputation). Due to the large number of clean surgical procedures conducted annually the costs of these surgical site infections (SSIs) can be considerable in financial and social terms. Preoperative skin antisepsis using antiseptics is performed to reduce the risk of SSIs by removing soil and transient organisms from the skin where a surgical incision will be made. Antiseptics are thought to be toxic to bacteria and therefore aid their mechanical removal. The effectiveness of preoperative skin preparation is thought to be dependent on both the antiseptic used and the method of application, however, it is unclear whether preoperative skin antisepsis actually reduces postoperative wound infection, and, if so, which antiseptic is most effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 12%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 34 25%