↓ Skip to main content

'Direct booking' for intrauterine contraception appointments: a better way of working?

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
'Direct booking' for intrauterine contraception appointments: a better way of working?
Published in
BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, June 2024
DOI 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Foster, Rebecca Strauss, Madeleine Crow

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,381,228
of 26,571,932 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health
#885
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,402
of 323,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,932 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.