The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of Peer- or Professional-Led Support in Enhancing Adherence to Wearable Monitoring Devices Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.2196/53607 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Colette Sze Wing Chan, Mandy Ming Pui Kan, Arkers Kwan Ching Wong |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 36% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 36% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2024.
All research outputs
#797,951
of 26,183,699 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#540
of 8,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,462
of 162,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,183,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.