↓ Skip to main content

Seagrass ecosystems reduce exposure to bacterial pathogens of humans, fishes, and invertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
823 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seagrass ecosystems reduce exposure to bacterial pathogens of humans, fishes, and invertebrates
Published in
Science, February 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aal1956
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joleah B Lamb, Jeroen A J M van de Water, David G Bourne, Craig Altier, Margaux Y Hein, Evan A Fiorenza, Nur Abu, Jamaluddin Jompa, C Drew Harvell

Abstract

Plants are important in urban environments for removing pathogens and improving water quality. Seagrass meadows are the most widespread coastal ecosystem on the planet. Although these plants are known to be associated with natural biocide production, they have not been evaluated for their ability to remove microbiological contamination. Using amplicon sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, we found that when seagrass meadows are present, there was a 50% reduction in the relative abundance of potential bacterial pathogens capable of causing disease in humans and marine organisms. Moreover, field surveys of more than 8000 reef-building corals located adjacent to seagrass meadows showed twofold reductions in disease levels compared to corals at paired sites without adjacent seagrass meadows. These results highlight the importance of seagrass ecosystems to the health of humans and other organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 378 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 823 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 806 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 148 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 127 15%
Student > Bachelor 113 14%
Student > Master 109 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 5%
Other 116 14%
Unknown 166 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 242 29%
Environmental Science 210 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 4%
Unspecified 12 1%
Other 81 10%
Unknown 194 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 609. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#37,808
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,579
of 83,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#805
of 323,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#35
of 1,225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.