You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experience-based design, co-design and experience-based co-design in palliative and end-of-life care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erica Borgstrom, Stephen Barclay |
| Abstract |
Experience-based design, co-design, and experience-based co-design can be used within healthcare to design services that improve the patient, carer and staff experience of the services. As palliative and end-of-life care centrally value person-centred care, we believe that service designers, commissioners and those tasked with making quality improvements will be interested in this growing field. This paper outlines these approaches-with a particular emphasis on experience-based co-design-and describes how they are and can be used within palliative and end-of-life care. Based on a rapid review and several case studies, this article highlights the key lessons learnt from previous projects using these approaches and discusses areas for improvement in current reporting of service design projects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Design | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,919,853
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#239
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,069
of 319,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.