↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D and mortality: Individual participant data meta-analysis of standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 26916 individuals from a European consortium

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin D and mortality: Individual participant data meta-analysis of standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 26916 individuals from a European consortium
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0170791
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Gaksch, Rolf Jorde, Guri Grimnes, Ragnar Joakimsen, Henrik Schirmer, Tom Wilsgaard, Ellisiv B. Mathiesen, Inger Njølstad, Maja-Lisa Løchen, Winfried März, Marcus E. Kleber, Andreas Tomaschitz, Martin Grübler, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Elias F. Gudmundsson, Tamara B. Harris, Mary F. Cotch, Thor Aspelund, Vilmundur Gudnason, Femke Rutters, Joline W. J. Beulens, Esther van ‘t Riet, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline M. Dekker, Diana Grove-Laugesen, Lars Rejnmark, Markus A. Busch, Gert B. M. Mensink, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Michael Thamm, Karin M. A. Swart, Ingeborg A. Brouwer, Paul Lips, Natasja M. van Schoor, Christopher T. Sempos, Ramón A. Durazo-Arvizu, Zuzana Škrabáková, Kirsten G. Dowling, Kevin D. Cashman, Mairead Kiely, Stefan Pilz

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for mortality but previous meta-analyses lacked standardization of laboratory methods for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations and used aggregate data instead of individual participant data (IPD). We therefore performed an IPD meta-analysis on the association between standardized serum 25(OH)D and mortality. In a European consortium of eight prospective studies, including seven general population cohorts, we used the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) protocols to standardize 25(OH)D data. Meta-analyses using a one step procedure on IPD were performed to study associations of 25(OH)D with all-cause mortality as the primary outcome, and with cardiovascular and cancer mortality as secondary outcomes. This meta-analysis is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02438488. We analysed 26916 study participants (median age 61.6 years, 58% females) with a median 25(OH)D concentration of 53.8 nmol/L. During a median follow-up time of 10.5 years, 6802 persons died. Compared to participants with 25(OH)D concentrations of 75 to 99.99 nmol/L, the adjusted hazard ratios (with 95% confidence interval) for mortality in the 25(OH)D groups with 40 to 49.99, 30 to 39.99, and <30 nmol/L were 1.15 (1.00-1.29), 1.33 (1.16-1.51), and 1.67 (1.44-1.89), respectively. We observed similar results for cardiovascular mortality, but there was no significant linear association between 25(OH)D and cancer mortality. There was also no significantly increased mortality risk at high 25(OH)D levels up to 125 nmol/L. In the first IPD meta-analysis using standardized measurements of 25(OH)D we observed an association between low 25(OH)D and increased risk of all-cause mortality. It is of public health interest to evaluate whether treatment of vitamin D deficiency prevents premature deaths.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 62 30%
Unknown 45 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Unspecified 8 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 64 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#255,390
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,753
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,919
of 307,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#95
of 4,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.