↓ Skip to main content

Gravitational body forces focus North American intraplate earthquakes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Gravitational body forces focus North American intraplate earthquakes
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms14314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Will Levandowski, Mark Zellman, Rich Briggs

Abstract

Earthquakes far from tectonic plate boundaries generally exploit ancient faults, but not all intraplate faults are equally active. The North American Great Plains exemplify such intraplate earthquake localization, with both natural and induced seismicity generally clustered in discrete zones. Here we use seismic velocity, gravity and topography to generate a 3D lithospheric density model of the region; subsequent finite-element modelling shows that seismicity focuses in regions of high-gravity-derived deviatoric stress. Furthermore, predicted principal stress directions generally align with those observed independently in earthquake moment tensors and borehole breakouts. Body forces therefore appear to control the state of stress and thus the location and style of intraplate earthquakes in the central United States with no influence from mantle convection or crustal weakness necessary. These results show that mapping where gravitational body forces encourage seismicity is crucial to understanding and appraising intraplate seismic hazard.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 28%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 78%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#328,789
of 14,030,753 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#5,890
of 25,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,479
of 258,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#339
of 1,084 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,030,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,084 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.