The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Maximizing Treatment Opportunities: Assessing Protocol Waivers' Impact on Safety and Outcome in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3917 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jade M van Berge Henegouwen, Laurien J Zeverijn, Birgit S Geurts, Louisa R Hoes, Hanneke van der Wijngaart, Vincent van der Noort, Alwin D R Huitema, Filip Y F de Vos, Katrien Grünberg, Haiko J Bloemendal, Henk M W Verheul, Emile E Voest, Hans Gelderblom |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#608,262
of 26,308,718 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#332
of 13,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,042
of 198,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#2
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,308,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.