↓ Skip to main content

Antithrombotic therapy for improving maternal or infant health outcomes in women considered at risk of placental dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antithrombotic therapy for improving maternal or infant health outcomes in women considered at risk of placental dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006780.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Anne McLeod, Rory C Windrim, John Kingdom

Abstract

Pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction and placental abruption are thought to have a common origin related to abnormalities in the development and function of the placenta.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 246 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 66 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Psychology 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 76 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2014.
All research outputs
#21,684,025
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,347
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,805
of 211,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#225
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.