↓ Skip to main content

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a clinical report on 4894 consecutive ART treatment cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a clinical report on 4894 consecutive ART treatment cycles
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12958-015-0067-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mário Sousa, Mariana Cunha, José Teixeira da Silva, Cristiano Oliveira, Joaquina Silva, Paulo Viana, Alberto Barros

Abstract

Although a large number of studies have been dedicated to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) none gave full embryological and clinical outcomes comparing oocyte trigger with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) versus with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (Buserelin) in cases with suspicious OHSS. The aim of the present study was thus to analyze 4894 consecutive assisted reproductive treatment cycles to undercover associated risk factors for development of OHSS, and the effects of the use of Buserelin as ovulation trigger on embryological and clinical outcomes. In the 51 cases that developed OHSS, ovulation trigger was performed with HCG as indicators were not suspicious for OHSS. These were compared against two types of groups: 71 cases where Buserelin was used for ovulation induction due to suspicious development of OHSS; and those remaining 4772 cases where ovulation trigger was currently performed with HCG (control). Of the cases treated with Buserelin the oocyte maturation rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate were significantly lower, with higher rates of ectopic pregnancy and newborn malformations, but none developed OHSS. Of the OHSS cases, 23 needed hospitalization, with no major complications. Young age, lower time of infertility, lower basal follicle stimulating hormone levels, higher number of cases with female factor and polycystic ovarian syndrome, high number of follicles and higher estradiol concentrations were the risk factors found associated with OHSS. Cases with OHSS also presented higher follicle count but the estradiol levels were within the normal range. It thus remains to develop more strict criteria to avoid all cases with OHSS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,932,082
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#213
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,652
of 264,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.