The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
PSC as an organisational level determinant of working time lost and expenditure following workplace injuries and illnesses
|
---|---|
Published in |
Safety Science, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106602 |
Authors |
Maureen F. Dollard, May Loh, Harry Becher, Daniel Neser, Sophie Richter, Amy Zadow, Ali Afsharian, Rachael Potter |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 22 | 69% |
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 22 | 69% |
Psychology | 4 | 13% |
Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2024.
All research outputs
#450,242
of 26,408,935 outputs
Outputs from Safety Science
#25
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#639
of 47,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Safety Science
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,408,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.