You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Imaging of Focal Amyloid Depositions in the Head, Neck, and Spine: Amyloidoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a1977 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Parmar, T. Rath, M. Castillo, D. Gandhi |
| Abstract |
Amyloidomas are benign tumorlike lesions consisting of localized deposits of amyloid and are the rarest form in the group of amyloidosis-related lesions. Diagnosis requires special stains; therefore, a high degree of suspicion for this disease is required. In this review, we describe the imaging features of amyloidomas involving the intracranial compartment, head and neck, and spine. We also discuss the differential diagnosis and briefly review the pertinent literature. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| India | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 34% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#939,463
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#79
of 5,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,504
of 175,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.