↓ Skip to main content

Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003106.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Churchill, Lelia Duley, Jim G Thornton, Leanne Jones

Abstract

Severe pre-eclampsia can cause significant mortality and morbidity for both mother and child, particularly when it occurs remote from term, between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. The only known cure for this disease is delivery. Some obstetricians advocate early delivery to ensure that the development of serious maternal complications, such as eclampsia (fits) and kidney failure are prevented. Others prefer a more expectant approach delaying delivery in an attempt to reduce the mortality and morbidity for the child associated with being born too early.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 71%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 18%
Psychology 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,550,986
of 13,596,964 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,391
of 10,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,622
of 155,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,596,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.