↓ Skip to main content

Genetic diversity among proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) biotypes assessed by AFLP technique

Overview of attention for article published in Planta Daninha, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 130)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic diversity among proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) biotypes assessed by AFLP technique
Published in
Planta Daninha, September 2004
DOI 10.1590/s0100-83582004000200001
Authors

D. Karam, P. Westra, S.J. Nissen, S.M. Ward, J.E.F. Figueiredo

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,922,209
of 26,445,486 outputs
Outputs from Planta Daninha
#26
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,220
of 70,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta Daninha
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them