↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000009.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunn Elisabeth Vist, Dianne Bryant, Lyndsay Somerville, Trevor Birminghem, Andrew D Oxman

Abstract

Some people believe that patients who take part in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) face risks that they would not face if they opted for non-trial treatment. Others think that trial participation is beneficial and the best way to ensure access to the most up-to-date physicians and treatments. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 1, 2005.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 189 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Unspecified 18 9%
Other 56 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 54%
Unspecified 28 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Psychology 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 23 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,948,582
of 13,444,619 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,829
of 10,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,874
of 155,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.